Clark v. His Creditors
F. B. CLARK v. HIS CREDITORS
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court :
Appellant says, first, that the jury were guilty of misconduct; second, that the evidence did not justify the verdict; third, that error occurred in the giving of instructions.
1. There was no evidence of misconduct in the jury-room, other than the affidavit of jurors. A juror cannot impeach his own verdict. (Polhemus v. Heiman, 50 Cal. 433, 441.)
2. There was a substantial conflict in the testimony.
3. The instructions were not. excepted to.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Meredith v. Board of Supervisors No. 4185 · 1875-07-01