Ladd v. Parnell
P. B. LADD, etc. v. JOHN PARNELL
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court:
The judgment in this cause is affirmed. The sureties on the undertaking upon appeal were notified of the motion for judgment, and failed to appear. We see nothing in the point that § 942 of the Code of Civil Procedure, allowing judgment on motion against the sureties, where they have subscribed such an undertaking as is required by that section, is unconstitutional.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- Davis v. Heimbach No. 12383 · 1888-03-20
- Meredith v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of Baltimore No. 7,779 · 1882-06-28