People v. Sprague
PEOPLE v. F. A. SPRAGUE
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court :
The remittitur on the former appeal having been regularly issued without inadvertence, we have no power to recall it; therefore, the motions that the remittitur be recalled and a bill of exceptions be settled are denied, and the order appealed from is affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
Cited by
- Petersen v. Civil Service Board Civ. No. 4811. · 1924-09-24
- Crenshaw Bros. v. Southern Pacific Co. Civ. No. 1950. · 1919-07-01
- In re Estate of Levinson No. 15916 · 1895-08-06
- People v. McDermott No. 20921 · 1893-01-21