Sheldon v. Gunn
W. C. SHELDON v. G. W. GUNN
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The Court This is an appeal from an order of the Court below, allowing its records to be amended so as to make them “ speak the truth.”
It satisfactorily appears from the evidence that the records were erroneous in certain particulars, and those errors were corrected 'by the Court on motion of the respondents. In our opinion, the Court acted properly, and within its authority, in directing the corrections to be made. (Rousset v. Boyle, 45 Cal. 64; McLeran v. McNamara, 55 id. 508.)
Cites, in this corpus
- Rousset v. Boyle No. 3,546 · 1872-07-01
Cited by
- People v. Buck Crim. 467 · 1941-08-25
- People v. Murback · 1883-11-28