People v. Williams
PEOPLE v. S. WILLIAMS
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court :
It must be considered as settled in this State by the cases of Dean v. Davis, 51 Cal. 409, People v. Reclamation District No. 108, 53 Cal. 346, and other cases in this Court, that a reclamation district is a public corporation.
The main purposes of the present action is to obtain a judgment to the effect that Reclamation District No. 3 was not legally created, and has not any legal existence, and that the defendants, Williams and others, usurp the powers of trustees, etc. The Court below found in favor of the defendants, and on the authority of Dean v. Davis and People v. Reclamation District No. 108, supra, we affirm the judgment and order.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Reclamation Dist. No. One Hundred & Eight No. 6012 · 1879-07-01
- Dean v. Davis No. 4706 · 1876-07-01
Cited by
- Reclamation District No. 70 v. Sherman Civ. No. 533. · 1909-09-29
- People Ex Rel. Post v. San Joaquin Valley Agric. Ass'n Sac. No. 1481. · 1907-09-04
- Central Irrigation District v. De Lappe No. 12984 · 1889-05-31
- Turlock Irrigation District v. Williams No. 12426 · 1888-05-31