gno.law

Scotland v. East Branch Mining Co.

California Supreme Court · No. 7,423 · 1880-07-01 · Published · 56 Cal. 625

THOMAS SCOTLAND v. EAST BRANCH MINING COMPANY

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

By the Court :

In this cause an appeal from the judgment is prosecuted by defendants Smith and Crittenden, against whom no judgment had been rendered. The appeal is therefore prematurely taken, and should be dismissed.

There is also an appeal by Crittenden from an order refusing to set aside a judgment by default against him.

There having been no judgment against him, this appeal is also prematurely taken.

The appeals are therefore dismissed.

Cited by