Gee v. Terrio
GEE v. TERRIO
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Milton H. Myrick (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Myrick
Myrick, J.:
This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit. There is in the transcript what purports to be a bill of exceptions, settled and agreed to by the attorneys for the respective parties, but not by the Judge. The Code requires that the bill of exceptions be settled by the judge who presided at the trial, instead of by agreement of the parties. No error appears in the record. Judgment affirmed.
Sharpstein, J., and Morrison, C. J., concurred.