Colusa County v. De Jarnett
COLUSA COUNTY v. DE JARNETT
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- From, Bench
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Frombench
By the Court, (from the Bench) :
The action was brought to restrain defendant, as County Auditor of Colusa County, from issuing a warrant in favor of W. G. Dyas, upon a claim in his favor, which had been allowed against the county for legal services rendered by him in behalf of the county, in an action to which it was a party. No contest was made against the claim itself. When the Board of Supervisors of the county allowed it, they acted as a quasi-judicial body, and their allowance and settlement was an adjudication of the claim, which is conclusive. (Subd. 12, § 4066, Pol. Code.)
There is nothing in the complaint to authorize the interposition of a Court of Equity, and we are of the opinion that the Court below properly sustained the demurrer to the complaint.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- Wilbur v. Board of Directors Docket No. 3525. · 1928-10-26
- Cope v. Flannery Docket No. 2835. · 1925-01-27
- Carmichael v. Riley Civ. No. 2400. · 1922-02-11
- Thiel Detective Co. v. County of Tuolumne Civ. No. 1812. · 1918-06-03
- Victors v. Kelsey Civ. No. 1586. · 1916-11-04
- County of Tehama v. Sisson Sac. No. 1455. · 1907-10-03
- Sullivan v. Gage S.F. No. 3062. · 1905-01-16
- County of Alameda v. Evers S.F. No. 2338. · 1902-03-22
- County of Santa Cruz v. McPherson S.F. No. 2225. · 1901-06-26
- Lamberson v. Jefferds Sac. No. 231 · 1897-09-25
- Lewis v. Colgan Sac. No. 164 · 1896-05-18
- Cahill v. Colgan No. 14,836 · 1892-11-22