Ames v. Eldred
AMES v. ELDRED
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Milton H. Myrick (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Myrick
Myrick, J.:
' The only question in this case is, as to the sufficiency of the declaration of homestead. Referring to the valuation of the premises, the declaration states “ that the actual cash value is $5,000 and over.” Section 1263 Civil Code provides that the declaration must contain an estimate of the actual cash value.
To say that a piece of property is of the value of $5,000 and over, is not to give an estimate of the actual cash value: it is not to say whether the property is worth $5,000 or $50,000. (Ashley v. Olmstead, 54 Cal. 616.)
. Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to sustain the demurrer to the complaint.
Thornton, J., and Sharpstein, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Ashley v. Olmstead No. 6,968 · 1880-07-01
Cited by
- Peter M. Elliott, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Kenneth P. Ostman and Douglas L. Ostman, Bankrupts v. Kenneth P. Ostman and Douglas L. Ostman 19360 · 1965-01-05
- Viotti v. Giomi Civ. 21235 · 1964-11-18
- In re Morse No. 155,309 · 1964-09-29
- In re Dulgarian No. 101205-WB BKCY · 1960-04-14
- Johnson v. Brauner Civ. 20469 · 1955-03-22
- Tappendorff v. Moranda S.F. No. 1980. · 1901-10-28
- De Greayer v. Superior Court S. F. No. 561 · 1897-08-21
- Knock v. Bunnell No. 12,469 · 1889-07-01
- Schuyler v. Broughton No. 12333 · 1888-06-09
- McCue v. Superior Court No. 11802 · 1887-01-14