In re of Fifteenth Ave. Extension
IN THE MATTER OF THE FIFTEENTH AVENUE EXTENSION
- Area
- other
- Panel
- Department (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Department
Department No. 1, by the Court:
The transcript not having been filed within the time prescribed by Rule 2 of this Court, the appeal must be dismissed. So ordered.
10,406.—PEOPLE v. CRAWFORD.
5,983.—‘KELLY v. MORGAN.
5,928.—SHAY v. LADY BRYAN MINING CO.
6,269.—WATERMAN et al. v. LIPMAN et al.
6,551.—COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO v. OAKS.
Judgment affirmed in the above cases, for default of appearance on the part of appellants.