Jewell v. McKinley
JEWELL v. McKINLEY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Department (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Department
Department No. 1, by the Court:
To determine the questions argued in the briefs of counsel, would be to determine the cause on the merits in advance, of the trial. This, as the case is presented, we think we ought not to do. We therefore express no opinion as to the validity or invalidity of the ordinance under which the defendants seek to justify their obstruction of the street in question, but upon the authority of Parrott v. Floyd, 54 Cal. 534, affirm the order.
Order affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Parrott v. Floyd No. 6,043 · 1880-07-01