gno.law

Paulson v. Nunan

California Supreme Court · No. 6,015 · 1880-07-01 · Published · 54 Cal. 123

PAULSON v. NUNAN

Area
civil
Panel
Department, From, Bench

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Departmentfrombench

Department No. 1, by the Court (from the Bench):

In this case there is an entire failure to find upon many of the material issues made by the pleadings. There is a finding upon a probative fact, from which it might be argued that the Court below was of a certain opinion as respects one of the ultimate facts; but there is no direct finding upon that issue, i. e., as to whether the plaintiff was or was not a peddler or huckster. But, passing that, there are a great many other averments, in respect to which there is no pretense of a finding; and we will have to follow the usual course in this case.

We all think that the judgment and order must be reversed, and the causé remanded for a new trial; and it is so ordered.

Cited by