Main v. Hilton
MAIN v. HILTON
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Department, From, Bench
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Departmentfrombench
Department No. 1, by the Court (from the Bench):
We are convinced that § 3102 of the Civil Code is applicable to the facts of this case; the purpose of the statute being that the party who makes an instrument negotiable in form, payable to his own order, if he receives a valid consideration therefor, (which is alleged in this complaint and was proven at *111the trial) shall be estopped from asserting, as against one who brings an action upon the instrument, that he has not indorsed it; and that the rule applies as well where the instrument is payable to the maker and a third person, (in case it has been indorsed by such third person) as where it is made payable to the maker alone.
For these reasons the judgment is affirmed.