Harper v. Strutz
S. G. HARPER v. JULIUS STRUTZ and H. A. FOX
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court :
The judgment is affirmed, because it appears by the record that at the time the action was brought there had been no distribution of the estate of Rosanna Keenan, deceased, and Bronner was still administrator of her estate, with the will annexed.
Judgment affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
Cited by
- Wolfson v. Beatty Civ. 19298 · 1953-06-09
- Wilson v. Stoudamire Civ. 14015 · 1943-09-30
- Plass v. Plass S. F. No. 782 · 1898-06-03