Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Coleman
WELLS, FARGO & CO. v. E. J. COLEMAN, ROBERT WATT, and JAMES T. MURPHY, Bank Commissioners
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- William T. Wallace (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Wallace
By the Court, Wallace, C. J.:
Irrespective of the question made in argument, as to the construction of the act, we think that the allegations of this bill would not support an injunction, and of course we could not reverse the order of the Court below refusing the injunction.
Inasmuch, however, as counsel on both sides have united in the request that we give expression to our views on the true construction of the act itself, I will add that we are all of opinion that incorporated commercial banks are plainly within the intent of the act, and subject to examination under its provisions.
Let the order be affirmed.
Cited by
- People ex rel. Gerberding v. Superior Court of S.F. No. 15469 · 1893-10-14