Holland v. Mount Auburn Gold Quartz Mining Co.
J. L. HOLLAND and EDWIN TILLEY v. MOUNT AUBURN GOLD QUARTZ MINING COMPANY
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court :
The defendant was in possession of the mining ground prior to the dates when the plaintiffs attempted to locate it, under the provisions of the Act of Congress of May 10, 1872.
Before the commencement of this action the location of plaintiffs was not distinctly marlced on the ground so that its boundaries could be readily traced, as required by the Act. (Rev. Stats. U. S. sec. 2324.)
Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Cited by
- Sarnow v. Wood Docket No. 844. · 1933-03-23
- Green v. Gavin Civ. No. 525. · 1909-03-27
- Doe v. Waterloo Min. Co. No. 145 · 1895-11-08
- Donahue v. Meister No. 14074 · 1891-02-25