gno.law

Phipps v. Harlan

California Supreme Court · No. 5852 · 1878-07-01 · Published · 53 Cal. 87

EDWARD L. PHIPPS, (A Minor, by Thos. B. Swain, His Guardian,) v. E. HARLAN, JOB MAULSBURY, W. T. BROWN, C. D. FOWLER, S. S. SWOPE, and S. F. WATSON

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

By the-Court:

Judgment and order denying a new trial affirmed as to the defendants Harlan, Maulsbury, Brown, Fowler, and Swope. Remittitur forthwith.

The judgment as to the defendant Watson reversed for want of a finding upon the affirmative defense set up in his answer, and as to him the cause is remanded with directions to make an additional finding upon the said affirmative defense, and thereupon to proceed to judgment as to the said defendant Watson. Remittitur forthwith.

Cited by