City of Stockton v. Clark
CITY OF STOCKTON v. ASA CLARK
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court :
The notice inviting sealed proposals did not refer to a diagram and specifications of the proposed work, as required by the twenty-seventh section of the Act of March 27th, 1872, to reincorporate the City of Stockton, and for that reason the proceedings are invalid, and the defendant’s property did not become liable for the assessment.
Judgment affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.