Wallace v. Miller
W. T. WALLACE v. HENRY MILLER
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
cited Gibbs v. Swift, 12 Cush. 393; Lawrence v. Bullon, 37 Cal. 518; Corbin v. Liv*656ingston, 14 Wend. 619 ; Schenk v. Evoy, 24 Cal. 110; Gales v. Salmon, 35 Cal. 576; Kimball v. Semple, 25 Cal. 452; Ellis v. Icans, 26 Cal. 272.
Francis E. Spencer, for Respondent.
By the Court :
It is ordered that " the judgment herein be and the same is hereby modified by the striking therefrom, wherever they occur, the words “ one twenty-eighth part,” and inserting in lieu thereof the words “ seven hundred and fifty twenty-one thousand three hundred and seventy-sevenths,” and in other respects the judgment and order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial, are affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
Cites, in this corpus
- Lawrence v. Ballou · 1869-07-01
- Gates v. Salmon · 1868-07-01
- Ellis v. Jeans · 1864-10-15
- Schenk v. Evoy · 1864-07-01
- Kimball v. Semple · 1864-07-01
Cited by
- Cullen v. Sprigg No. 13131 · 1890-02-03