Botsford v. Howell
C. A. BOTSFORD v. MARK HOWELL
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
The plaintiff, in his application to purchase the lands, stated, that “ he did not know of any valid claim to the same other than his own, and that there were no settlers thereon, or, if there were, that the land had been segregated more than six months.” The application does not conform to sec. 3442 of the Political Code. The facts required by that section to be stated in the application must be stated directly and positively, and not in an alternative form, as in this case.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings. Remittitur forthwith.
Cited by
- Barbree v. Kingsbury Civ. No. 869. · 1911-09-29
- Moran v. Bonynge L.A. No. 2412. · 1910-02-07
- Millidge v. Hyde No. 9125 · 1885-05-05
- McCoy v. Byrd No. 8,123 · 1884-02-28
- Wilke v. Cohn No. 6,092 · 1880-07-01