Patochi v. Cent. Pac. R.R.
CAROLINE PATOCHIs. v. THE CENTRAL PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court :
The verdict, in so far as it awarded damages “in United States gold coin,” was unwarranted, and this clause should have *91been disregarded in entering the judgment. ( Watson v. S. F. & H. B. R. R. Co. 50 Cal. 523.) We find no other error in the record.
Judgment and order affirmed, except in so far as the judgment requires payment in gold coin, and the case is remanded, with instructions to the Court below to modify the judgment in accordance with this opinion.
Cites, in this corpus
- Watson v. San Francisco & Humboldt Bay Railroad No. 4839 · 1875-07-01
Cited by
- McMahon v. Hetch-Hetchy & Yosemite Valleys Railway Co. Civ. No. 84. · 1905-12-09