County of Monterey v. McKee
COUNTY OF MONTEREY v. ROBERT McKEE
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
It is not necessary to decide whether the county judge had authority to hear or determine the motion to discharge the attachment, since, assuming he had jurisdiction, he determined it wrongly.
The official bond of the defendant as county treasurer was an obligation for the direct payment of money. (San Francisco v. Brader, 50 Cal. 506; Hathaway v. Davis, 83 Cal. 161.)
Order appealed from reversed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Jue Fook Sam v. Lord No. 13462 · 1890-02-25
- City & County of San Francisco v. Brader No. 4664 · 1875-07-01
Cited by
- Rose v. Pearman Civ. 22788 · 1958-09-12
- Tyson v. Reinecke Civ. No. 1387. · 1914-11-07