Brewster v. Johnson
J. A. BREWSTER v. J. A. JOHNSON
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
There was no oral argument of the cause, nor has either party filed points and authorities. We decline to perform the duty of counsel by examining the record to ascertain if possibly error may not have intervened in the court below.
If an appellant omits to point out the errors of which he complains, the judgment will be affirmed without looking into the record.
Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five per cent, damages.
Cited by
- Drexler v. Seal Rock Tobacco Co. No. 11022 · 1889-04-20
- Peek v. Peek No. 12315 · 1888-03-20
- Faris v. Lampson No. 11892 · 1887-08-16