Roberts v. Treadwell
GEORGE D. ROBERTS v. L. L. TREADWELL
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
The complaint did not allege that the defendant had not paid the indebtedness, for the recovery of which this action was brought. It merely averred “that the whole thereof is now due.” This defect in the complaint was pointed out by a special demurrer, which was overruled. The insufficiency of the complaint in the respect indicated was adverted to in Frisch v. Caler (21 Cal. 71).
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Cites, in this corpus
- Frisch v. Caler · 1862-07-01
Cited by
- Ingalls v. Bell Civ. 2566 · 1941-03-07
- Zimmerman v. Prior Civ. No. 2481. · 1920-02-06
- A. Widemann Co. v. Digges Civ. No. 1147. · 1913-02-28
- Knox v. Buckman Contracting Co. S.F. No. 2431. · 1903-07-15
- Penrose v. Winter Sac. No. 800. · 1901-12-31
- Hurley v. Ryan S. F. No. 772 · 1897-11-17
- Tomlinson v. Ayres S. F. No. 520 · 1897-07-16
- London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Co. v. Liebes No. 15784 · 1894-12-22