Patterson v. Board of Supervisors
WM. H. PATTERSON v. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
The granting or continuing of a preliminary injunction is often a matter of discretion, and this Court ought not to reverse the action of the District Court in that regard, except when there is manifest mistake or an abuse of discretion. (Godey v. Godey, 39 Cal. 157.)
In view of the gravity of the questions involved in this case, and the circumstance that the dissolution of the restraining order might possibly produce great evil, while its continuance can produce no serious injury, we are unwilling to say that there was an abuse of discretion or a manifest mistake in making the order appealed from.
It accords with the theory of our system, that the Supreme Court shall have the benefit of the judgment of the District Court at the final hearing below, and, except in a clear case, we ought not to anticipate the final judgment of the District Court by our action on appeal from the order granting the preliminary injunction.
Our present judgment is not intended to be any intimation of what the judgment of the District Court should be at the final hearing.
Order affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- De Godey v. Godey No. 2,259 · 1870-07-01
Cited by
- North Coast Coalition v. Woods Civ. 48930 · 1980-10-01
- Socialist Workers 1974 California Campaign Committee v. Brown Docket Nos. 45943, 46314, 46258 · 1975-12-19
- Continental Baking Co. v. Katz L.A. 28728 · 1968-04-30
- Wood v. Bufford Civ. No. 4397. · 1923-02-27
- Schwartz v. Arata Civ. No. 2070. · 1920-01-28
- Marre v. Union Oil Co. of California Civ. No. 895. · 1911-10-02
- Porters Bar Dredging Co. v. Beaudry Civ. No. 790. · 1911-04-03
- Flood v. E. L. Goldstein Co. S.F. No. 4766. · 1910-08-27
- Marks v. Weinstock, Lubin & Co. Sac. No. 298 · 1898-05-31
- Grannis v. Lorden No. 19378 · 1894-08-01