King v. Montgomery
WILLIAM KING v. W. W. MONTGOMERY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Niles (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Niles
By the Court, Niles, J.:
The complaint contained no averment that the action against Dobbs and King was commenced, or the writ of attachment sued out and prosecuted, without probable cause. In this the complaint was clearly insufficient, and the plaintiff declining to amend, the motion to dismiss was properly granted.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- White Lighting Co. v. Wolfson L. A. 29493 · 1968-03-14
- McPheeters v. Bateman Civ. 10204 · 1936-01-04
- Loock v. Pioneer Title Insurance and Trust Co. Civ. 1541 · 1935-01-29
- Vesper v. Crane Co. L.A. No. 2908. · 1913-02-28
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Thornton S. F. No. 618 · 1897-07-08
- De Toro v. Robinson No. 14180 · 1891-09-25
- Kelley v. Kriess No. 9023 · 1885-12-21