Harlan v. Pratt
HARLAN v. PRATT
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
The notice of appeal was filed on March 21,1874, but was not served until the 23d of that month. Under the statute, *95as it stood at those periods, these steps did not operate an appeal. (Columbet v. Pacheco, 46 Cal. 650.) Upon the face of the record, no appeal appearing to have been taken, the motion to dismiss the appeal must be denied.
So ordered.
Cites, in this corpus
- Columbet v. Pacheco 3,738 · 1873-07-01