Simmons v. Keller
ORRIN SIMMONS, Administrator of the Estate of BEZER SIMMONS v. JOHN KELLER
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Niles (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Niles
By the Court, Niles, J.:
A similar question was presented in Chipman v. Hibberd (47 Cal. 638), where we affirmed the order of the District Court dismissing a pending action for the failure of the plaintiff to prosecute within a reasonable time. We think there was no abuse of the discretion of the Court in this case.
Order affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Chipman v. Hibberd No. 2,851 · 1874-07-01
Cited by
- Oberkotter v. Spreckels Civ. No. 4211. · 1923-11-21
- Romero v. Snyder L.A. No. 3243. · 1914-02-06
- People's Home Sav. Bank v. Sherman L.A. No. 1610. · 1907-04-02
- San Jose Land & Water Co. v. Allen L.A. No. 635. · 1900-07-19
- People Ex Rel. Stone v. Jefferds Sac. No. 427. · 1899-10-12
- McLaughlin v. Clausen L. A. No. 172 · 1897-04-08
- First National Bank v. Nason L. A. No. 141 · 1897-01-22
- Hassey v. S. San Francisco Homestead & R.R. Ass'n No. 15387 · 1894-06-05
- Kreiss v. Hotaling No. 15088 · 1893-08-29