Chandler v. Dunn
L. C. CHANDLER v. J. J. DUNN
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Niles (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Niles
By the Court, Niles, J.:
The plaintiff’s title is derived through a sale for delinquent taxes for the fiscal year 1868-9—the defendant’s through a sale for taxes for the year 1865-6. The facts are substantially the same as in the case of Anderson v. Rider (46 Cal. 138), in which we held that “the title acquired under a tax sale for taxes of a subsequent year must prevail over a title founded on a sale for the taxes of a previous year.” (Dougherty v. Henarie, 47 Cal. 10.)
Judgment reversed. Bemittitur forthwith.
Cites, in this corpus
- Anderson v. Rider No. 3,563 · 1873-07-01
Cited by
- Billings v. Delgado Civ. No. 3029 · 1942-04-27
- Woodill & Hulse Electric Co. v. Young L. A. No. 4930. · 1919-07-05
- Blanchard v. Ladd S.F. No. 1922. · 1901-12-26