gno.law

Schwalm v. Holmes

California Supreme Court · No. 4,677 · 1875-07-01 · Published · 49 Cal. 665

FRANCIS SCHWALM v. H. T. HOLMES AND WM. GWYNN, Constituting the firm of H. T. HOLMES & CO

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

By the Court:

The contract recited in the answer is not illegal, as being in restraint of trade. The Court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the answer.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to overrule the demurrer to the answer.

Cited by