San Felipe Mining Co. v. Belshaw
SAN FELIPE MINING CO., GALEN M. FISHER, CHAS. H. WHEELER and ALFRED WHEELER v. M. W. BELSHAW, EGBERT JUDSON, VICTOR BEAUDRY and WM. L. HUNTER
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
Irrespective of other points made by the appellant, and which need not now be considered, we are of opinion that the Court below erred in instructing the jury that the agreement of August 4th, 1870, was sufficient in point of law to divest the interest of De la Mere and vest the same in the plaintiff, so as to enable the plaintiff to recover that interest in this action.
Judgment and order denying a new trial reversed and cause remanded. Remittitur forthwith.
Cited by
- Murphy v. Crowley S.F. No. 2481. · 1903-09-04