In re Estate of Wright
In the Matter of the Estate of STEPHEN A. WRIGHT
- Area
- probate
- Panel
- Richard W. Rhodes (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Rhodes
By the Court, Rhodes, J.:
The Court below ordered that a certain portion of the estate be distributed to the widow and heirs of the deceased; and, subsequently, denied the executor’s motion for a new trial. From these orders the executor alone appeals. The executor does not object to the order on the ground that the amount ordered to be distributed is too large, but only that it is not properly distributed—that the order allots to one party too large a portion. The executor is not interested in that question; and Bates v. Ryberg (40 Cal. 463), is clear authority that he cannot maintain an appeal on that ground.
Orders affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
Cites, in this corpus
- Bates v. Ryberg 2,647 · 1871-01-15
Cited by
- In Re Estate of Ayers S. F. No. 7307. · 1917-05-23
- Hebrew Home for Aged Disabled v. Friedman S. F. No. 7049. · 1915-12-13
- Rice v. Carey Sac. No. 2145. · 1915-08-05
- Stewart v. Smith Civ. No. 345. · 1907-07-30
- McCabe v. Healy Sac. No. 934. · 1902-12-16
- Jones v. Lamont Sac. No. 309 · 1897-10-08
- Goldtree v. Thompson No. 13539 · 1890-03-10
- In re Jessup No. 13124 · 1889-09-30
- Roach v. Coffey No. 12000 · 1887-08-30