People v. Buckley
THE PEOPLE v. DANIEL BUCKLEY
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- E. W. McKinstry (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — McKinstry
By the Court, McKinstry, J.:
The verdict is good. When the jury ' ‘ agree ” they ‘' find ” if they return their agreement into Court. The verdict would have been sufficient if it had been simply “Guilty of murder in the second degree.”
The defendant challenged a juror thus: “I challenge the juror for implied bias.” This was not a proper specification of the grounds of challenge. (People v. Reynolds, 16 Cal. 130; People v. Renfrow 41 Cal. 37.)
Judgment and order affirmed.
Neither Mr. Justice Crockett nor Mr. Justice Rhodes expressed an opinion.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Renfrow No. 2,357 · 1871-07-01
Cited by
- People v. Prieto CA5 F068805 · 2016-10-03
- People v. Owens Crim. No. 461 · 1899-02-17