McQuillan v. Donahue
McQUILLAN v. DONAHUE
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- William T. Wallace (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Wallace
Mr. Chief Justice Wallace, speaking for the Court, said:
We are of opinion that this provision of the statute is directory merely.
Judgment. affirmed.
Cited by
- F.People v. Monier S216566 · 2017-11-27
- Chrysler Corp. v. New Motor Vehicle Board D016270 · 1993-01-15
- Sperisen v. Heynemann Civ. 17098 · 1957-03-19
- Garrison v. Rourke Sac. 5956 · 1948-08-20
- Merner Lumber Co. v. Silvey Civ. 10518 · 1938-11-29
- Hall v. Justice's Court Civ. No. 269. · 1907-03-01
- Heinlen v. Phillips No. 13925 · 1891-04-02
- McLennan v. Bank of California No. 12944 · 1891-01-31