Harvey v. Ward
CHARLES HARVEY v. LOOMIS WARD
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
1. We think that the findings of the Court are sustained by the evidence.
2. There was no error in overruling the objection to the introduction of the judgment roll in the action of Harvey v. Finch. The objection taken was that the roll was “irrelevant, immaterial and not pertinent to any issue in this case.” The judgment roll was admissible as evidence tending to prove the indebtedness of Finch to the plaintiff.
Judgment affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
Cited by
- Nordin v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n Civ. No. 10453 · 1936-01-03