Hartman v. Olvera
ISAAC HARTMAN v. AUGUSTIN OLVERA
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
The defendant not having complied with the terms upon which the default and judgment had been set aside, both the default and judgment remained in force in the same manner as if the order for setting them aside had not been made.
The second application to set aside the default and judgment came too late, it having been made more than five months after the adjournment of the term at which the judgment had been entered.
Order of February 9, 1874, reversed. Remittitur forthwith.
Cited by
- Jacuzzi v. Jacuzzi Bros., Inc. Docket Nos. 22233, 22321 · 1966-06-22