Craig v. Bateman
PETER CRAIG, Administrator of the Estate of J. H. Mullins v. MICHAEL C. BATEMAN, JOHN O'CONNOR and TIMOTHY P. REARDEN
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court :
We are of opinion that the answer of the defendants, in so far as it denies that there had been a final settlement of the accounts of Bateman, and denies that a final decree had been entered in the Probate Court upon such settlement, was sufficient in form and substance to defeat a motion for judgment in favor of the plaintiff on the pleadings.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial. Remittitur forthwith.