Sneath v. Griffin
R. G. SNEATH v. MARTIN GRIFFIN, R. A. McDONELL and ALEX MOORE
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- E. W. McKinstry (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — McKinstry
By the Court, McKinstry, J.:
For the reasons stated in the brief of counsel for appellant, the judgment and order should be reversed, and the District Court should order and adjudge the defendants, McDonell and Moore, bound by the original judgment to »the extent of six hundred and thirty-seven dollars thereof.
So ordered.
Mr. Chief Justice Wallace did nobexpress an opinion.
Cited by
- People ex rel. Morgan v. Hayne No. 13660 · 1890-02-06