People v. Hyde
THE PEOPLE v. ISAAC HYDE, E. F.NORTHAM, R. B. WOODWARD, J. S. CONE, THE ANTELOPE RANCH AND MILL COMPANY, and the Real Estate described in the Complaint
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- E. W. McKinstry (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — McKinstry
By the Court, McKinstry, J.:
Even though it be assumed that the description contained in the assessment is sufficient, the complaint alleges that a large'portion of the lands assessed to the defendants belonged, in fact, to other persons. But the attempted assessment is void. (People v. Cone, ante p. 427.)
Judgment and order reversed.
Cited by
- Sinai v. Mull Civ. 7319 · 1947-06-11