Bartlett v. Aitken
EARL BARTLETT, of the will of George Lumley v. CHARLES H. AITKEN
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court.
The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for a breach of a verbal contract to r¡ convey real estate. No such action can be maintained, at law.
If it be claimed that the conveyance from plaintiff to defendant was intended as a mortgage, the former must apply to a Court of equity so to declare.
Judgment sustaining the demurrer to the amended complaint is affirmed.
Cited by
- Paul v. Layne & Bowler Corp. L. A. 16268 · 1937-09-20