People v. Roach
THE PEOPLE v. ROACH
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Niles (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Niles
By the Court, Niles, J.:
The record purports to set forth “ substantially all the evidence given at the trial.” There was no evidence whatever tending to show that the offense was committed in the county of Mendocino, as charged. This "omission is fatal. (People v. Parks, 44 Cal. 105; Peoples. York, 9 Cal. 421.) Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.
Mr. Justice Rhodes did not express an opinion.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Parks No. 3,338 · 1872-07-01
- People v. York · 1858-07-01
Cited by
- People v. Simon S077866 · 2001-06-25
- People v. Sering D012059 · 1991-07-19
- People v. Megladdery Crim. 2090 · 1940-09-30
- People v. Pollock Crim. 1625 · 1938-05-26
- People v. Meseros Crim. No. 318. · 1910-05-15