gno.law

Pavisich v. Bean

California Supreme Court · No. 3,900 · 1874-07-01 · Published · 48 Cal. 364 · 1874 Cal. LEXIS 156

CHARLES PAVISICH v. LEROY S. BEAN

Area
civil
Panel
E. W. McKinstry (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — McKinstry

By the Court, McKinstry, J.:

The answer was a general denial. There was no plea of non-joinder of parties defendant, and the motion for non-suit was properly denied.

The third and fourth counts in the plaintiff’s complaint state a cause of action. (Wilkins v. Stidger, 22 Cal. 231; Abadie v. Carrillo, 32 Id. 172; Merritt v. Glidden, 39 Id. 564.)

Judgment affirmed.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by