Gray v. Corey
RICHARD GRAY v. WILLIAM COREY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- E. W. McKinstry (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — McKinstry
By the Court, McKinstry, J.:
The Court below held that there was not an actual or immediate delivery and continued change of possession of the personal property, sued for in this action, so as to render the sale valid as against the creditors of Donnellan. We think this conclusion is sustained by the finding of facts.
Judgment affirmed.
Mr. Justice Rhodes did not express an opinion.
Cited by
- O'Connor v. O'Connor, Rice & Barnes Civ. 2631 · 1941-04-02