Central Pacific Railroad v. Corcoran
THE CENTRAL PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. MARTIN CORCORAN, Tax Collector of Santa Clara County
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Richard W. Rhodes (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Rhodes
By the Court, Rhodes, J.:
It was held in Savings and Loan Society v. Austin, 46 Cal. 415, and the other tax' cases decided at the October term, 1873, and in Houghton v. Austin, 47 Cal. 646, that an injunction Avas not the proper remedy in those actions. Upon the authority of those cases, the order dissolving the injunction is affirmed.
Remittitur forthwith.
Cites, in this corpus
- Houghton v. Austin No. 4,125 · 1874-07-01
- Savings & Loan Society v. Austin No. 3,729 · 1873-07-01
Cited by
- Universal Consolidated Oil Co. v. Byram L. A. 18121; L. A. 18122 · 1944-12-05
- Lent v. Tillson No. 8540 · 1887-05-31
- Bank of Santa Rosa v. Chalfant No. 5172 · 1877-07-01