Kincaid v. Johnson
BENJAMIN KINCAID v. WILLIAM A. JOHNSON
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
This appeal is by the defendant from a judgment for $90. The answer admits that the defendant was liable to the plaintiff for the reñí of the property, but avers that the amount due was only $70. The proof as to the value of the rents was conflicting, and we cannot disturb the judgment on the ground that it was not justified by the evidence, in respect to the amount due. The appeal is frivolous, and was apparently taken for delay. ;
Judgment affirmed, with fifty per cent, damages. Remittitur forthwith.
Cited by
- Houser & Haines Manufacturing Co. v. Hargrove Sac. No. 738 · 1900-02-03
- Lake County v. Sulphur Bank Quicksilver Mining Co. No. 8,057 · 1884-10-10