Higuerra v. Bernal
MANUELLA HIGUERRA v. JOSE REYES BERNAL
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
The motion for a new trial was granted upon the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. There was a conflict of testimony upon the issues submitted to the jury, and in such case it is settled that this Court will not interfere with the judgment of the Court below. There was no error in retaxing the costs which were allowed to the plaintiff.
Order affirmed.
Cited by
- Hiraide v. Cochran Docket No. 152. · 1930-11-07
- In re the Estate of Carriger No. 15515 · 1894-09-13
- Curtiss v. Starr & Co. No. 12872 · 1890-08-26