Powell v. Lane
WINFRED POWELL v. M. B. LANE, JOHN LANE, and MARY LANE
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
The facts of the case do not bring it within the provisions of either the first or second section of the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act of 1866; nor can the action be maintained under the third section, for an entry is not unlawful, within the meaning of that section, which was made peaceably and in good faith. (Shelby v. Houston, 38 Cal. 410-22; Townsend v. Little, ante, 673.) In this case the entry of the defendant was lawful, peaceable, and in good faith.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Shelby v. Houston · 1869-07-01
Cited by
- Jordan v. Talbot S. F. 20578 · 1961-04-13
- Dutcher v. Sanders Civ. No. 1183. · 1912-12-09
- Goldstein v. Webster Civ. No. 432. · 1908-03-16
- Phenix Mill & Mining Co. v. Lawrence No. 6,958 · 1880-07-01
- Potter v. Mercer No. 5407 · 1879-07-01