Lacore v. Leonard
LACORE v. LEONARD
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
The plaintiff’s lien had expired before his action was-commenced. He took judgment foreclosing the lien, and directing a sale of the property by default; but on the next *395day, the matter being called to the attention of the Court, it was ordered that the judgment be so modified as to give him a money judgment only. There was no error in the action of the Court in this respect.
J udgment affirmed.
Cited by
- Becker v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty. S.F. No. 4644. · 1907-05-21
- Miller v. Carlisle Sac. No. 584. · 1899-12-29
- Ascha v. Fitch Sac. No. 115 · 1896-10-06