Himmelmann v. Haskell
HIMMELMANN v. HASKELL
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
A party moving under Rule Fifteen that a cause be placed on the calendar, on the ground that “ the opposite party has failed to file his transcript or his brief, or points and authorities, as prescribed by Rule Two,” must show that the opposite party was in default at the time when the Clerk was required by Rule Fifteen to make up the calendar.
Motion denied.