Bell v. Knowles
W. H. BELL v. J. E. KNOWLES and W. H. COWPER
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
1. The objection to the admissibility of certain evidence, now made here for the first time, cannot prevail. Had it been made and insisted upon at the trial, which it was not, *195an amendment of the complaint would, no doubt, have been directed.
2. Upon the issues determined by the judgment the evidence is of such a character that we will not disturb the judgment.
3. There is nothing in the point as to the rate of interest named in the judgment. ' Judgment and order affirmed.
Cited by
- Newhouse v. Upchurch Civ. 10823 · 1971-12-20
- Cushing v. Pires S. F. No. 1089 · 1899-06-05
- Kofoed v. Gordon L. A. Nos. 353, 354 · 1898-11-16
- Yik Hon v. Spring Valley Water Works No. 8,451 · 1884-09-24
- Atherton v. Fowler No. 3,659 · 1873-07-01